Re: I give up! Help on avc message for dev dm-0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gianfranco Durin wrote:
Paul Howarth wrote:
Gianfranco Durin wrote:
Paul Howarth wrote:
Gianfranco Durin wrote:
Paul Howarth wrote:
In any case, what is dm-0?

The first device mapper device, which might be your root filesystem if you're using LVM or RAID.

[skip]

Dear all and Paul,
today I realized a problem with my dm devices. In fact, fdik -l (see below) says there are no valid partition tables. After the installation of FC5 (which is only 2 weeks ago) I did not make anything about this, I think.

I guess this problem is related to the avc message (file_t, labelling problem, as Paul says).

But is there a way to solve?

Many (^10) thanks for your help

Gianfranco
---------------------------
Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *           1          67      538146    e  W95 FAT16 (LBA)
/dev/sda2              68          80      104422+  83  Linux
/dev/sda3              81       30401   243553432+  8e  Linux LVM

Disk /dev/sdb: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdb1   *           1          67      538146    e  W95 FAT16 (LBA)
/dev/sdb2              68       30401   243657855   8e  Linux LVM

Disk /dev/dm-0: 24.6 GB, 24628953088 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2994 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Disk /dev/dm-0 doesn't contain a valid partition table

This looks to be one of your LVM physical volumes and it's not expected to contain a partition table.

We still need to find out which actual file is trying to be accessed when you get that AVC.

Paul.


Ok fine. I tried this from /

ls --scontext -R |grep :file_t

and I have 3 type of files:

lost+found

These should be lost_found_t

install.log
install.log.syslog

but the last two are old (of the first day, actually).

They are the logs from the installation, when SELinux was probably not running. You can fix those:

# restorecon -v /root/install.log*

Dos it make sense?

I suspect that these aren't the source of the problem. You may have a directory labelled file_t that is used as a mountpoint and thus hidden under another filesystem once the system has booted.

When exactly do you get these AVCs? Just at boot time, or all the time?

Paul.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux