dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Also, looking at what logwatch reports, I noticed the following:
Packages Erased:
bind-config
Another WAG but it appears to have been replaced by:
Packages Installed:
sane-backends-libs.i386 1.0.18-2.fc5
kernel.i686 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5
caching-nameserver.i386 30:9.3.2-33.fc5 <-- This
libgconf-java.i386 2.12.4-2.fc5
Sort of responding to my own post... Given the above, I found the
following output from yum today to be quite amusing:
Added 63 new packages, deleted 51 old in 28.11 seconds
Resolving Dependencies
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
---> Downloading header for bind-config to pack into transaction set.
bind-config-9.3.2-20.FC5. 100% |=========================| 35 kB
00:00
---> Package bind-config.i386 30:9.3.2-20.FC5 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: bind = 30:9.3.2-20.FC5 for package: bind-config
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: bind = 30:9.3.2-20.FC5 is needed by package
bind-config
Thu Sep 28 12:50:31 MDT 2006
[root@spindle ~]# rpm -q bind
bind-9.3.2-33.fc5
[root@spindle ~]# rpm -q bind-config
package bind-config is not installed
Looks like some part of FC5 still thinks bind-config is needed. I have
a funny feeling I'll have to figure out why or yum updates will fail on
bind-config dependencies until I do.
Cheers,
Dave
--
Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles.
-- Ambrose Bierce
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
