Quoting Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Thanks, Tony, see below...
> At 3:38 PM -0700 9/23/06, Dave Stevens wrote:
> >Quoting Keith <ac7xc1nx@xxxxxxxxx>:
> ...
> > > Obtain the rescue CD, boot without mounting the partition and do a
> > > fsck.ext3 /dev/hd## with the hard drive unmounted.
> > >
> >
> >Thanks but no joy. I get:
> >
> >e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
> >e2fsck: Bad magic number in superblock while trying to open /dev/hdb2
> >The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2
> >filesystem.
> >If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2 filesystem (and not
> swap
> >or ufs or something else), then the superblock is corrupt and you might try
> >running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
> >e2fsck -b 8193 <device>
> >
> >So I've done that and get the same message repeatedly with or without the
> -b
> >parameter. Are there other alternate superblocks? copies? data recovery
> >utilities?
>
> There are lots of alternate superblocks. See man e2fsck and man
> mke2fs with reference to -b -n.
gives this:
linux:/sbin # e2fsck -n /dev/hda2
e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
Couldn't find ext2 superblock, trying backup blocks...
e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/hda2
The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2
filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2
filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock
is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
e2fsck -b 8193 <device>
I don't understand the severity of this problem. If my data on the drive is
irretrievably lost I will reluctantly reformat, install FC5_64 to replace the
FC3 now missing in action and life will carry on. I have a backup of my mail
and docs from ten days ago so it won't be a catastrophe.
But if the fix is only obscure and not too time consuming I'd rather put in
the time to both learn what went wrong and to recover my installation to where
it is possible to do a more recent backup at least.
I am currently running from a SUSE Linux 9.2 Live CD. In that environment YAST
recognizes the partition (hda2, as you may have gathered) as an LVM volume,
but that's as far as I get. I think the difficulty with using alternative
superblocks is related to the block size and that the alternative superblocks
are ?only? applicable to other block sizes. The block size in that partition
has always been reported by df and du in 1K increments.
Ideas? further suggestions? reading I can do online on this?
Dave
> --
> ____________________________________________________________________
> TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
--
In the world?s anti-Bush zones it is fashionable to regard him as an
imperialist
redneck of limited intellectual capacities. -- George Ross in Le Monde
Diplomatique
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
