Re: howto isolate 2 nics?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 14:00, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
...

The 169 address is a red herring, that like 3 day old fish, should be thrown out. Its a redhat/fedora artifact I believe, for what useage I have no idea. All I know is its there on every fedora machine since about FC3 or 4, my lappy FC5 has it, and it is not setup in any config file anyplace. And it is not part of any network or subnet at that site.

I think we're losing track of the real problem by being distracted by the 169 address. We'd kill it if we knew how to do it.

another old fish:
NOZEROCONF=yes

in your /etc/sysconfig/network


--
	
   ronald

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux