On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 10:32 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: > Adding the local hostname seems to be a Fedora thing, and I see no > good reason for it. Do you mean having a localhost name entry? I have to wonder about that, localhost = 127.0.0.1 on just about everything. It could be presumed to be present, whether or not it actually is. Do you mean adding the local host's name to the localhost line? I think this a bad idea, even if the machine is not connected to any other networkable device. It might be the case now, but two weeks later when someone tries to SMB between two boxes, and wonders why Windows cannot browse "\\localhost\myfiles"... Do you mean adding a line for the local host addresses to the hosts file? If you have any service, including the X server, sendmail, etc., that tries to start up using the machine's hostname, it has to be able to know what IP and name are associated with each other. -- (Currently running FC4, occasionally trying FC5.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
