On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 21:19 +0800, Deepak Shrestha wrote: > On 9/7/06, Rainer Traut <tr.ml@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > dominique schrieb: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I began to use RH (then FC) 5 years ago, but im just a user (not a pro > > > at all) > > > The 6 install that i already made before, worked without any trouble. > > > Im trying to build a new box, and for the first time, i dont succeed to > > > install FC5. > > > > > > HW: > > > INTEL dual core E6600 > > > MB INTEL 965LT (that includes eth, and sound ability) > > > 2X disk SATA 300G (STA2) SEAGATE > > > no floppy > > > DVD R/W LG1640 (IDE) > > > 2X 1G 667 MHz KingMax DDR-2 > > > nvidia 6200 > > > keyb USB - mouse PS2 > > > > > > > If you run the sata discs in AHCI mode (assuming you managed to > > install), you're out of luck with the latest kernel. Here's a bugzilla I > > opened: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204586 > > > > Rainer > > > > > > I am suspecting that certain motherboards are not supported. In my > case its "ASRock" motherboard for P4 with Hyperthreading capabilities > and I had no luck installing FC5 or FC4 in this machine. It stops at > certain point after vmlinuz starts. I had posted this message long > time ago but no answer from anybody. Please have a look at this: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2006-June/msg04583.html > FC6 test 2 failed too, (after FC5 and FC4) the same way. therefore, the version of the kernel is very probably not the cause of the failure. Its hard for me to believe that a commun MB is not supported (Intel says linux supported, and i updated the BIOS). - Is there any kind of mistake that i could have done when i plugged the hardware ? or when i setted the BIOS choices ? - If i have to use another MB, what would you advice has a safe choice. dominique -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
