James Wilkinson wrote: >> I'm not sure what you are saying. >> I only have one "echo" program /bin/echo and one "true" program /bin/true >> . I would find it confusing if I had two programs /bin/echo and >> /sbin/echo which did slightly different things. > > You also have echo built into bash. If you type (say) > $ echo Trinity College Dublin > into bash, bash *won't* call /bin/echo, but use its own internal > variant. Try > $ type echo > $ type yum > and look at the differences. That's a completely different issue. As I pointed out, if an application asks you to type "true" it is unlikely to be invoking the program "/bin/true"/ > I'm sorry if I'm shattering some of your illusions here. But there is a > lot of Unix precedent for things that do *much* the same thing to be > called by the same name. You haven't yet given any example of two different programs with the same name. I know lots of examples of the opposite - the same program with symlinks with different names, where the program looks to see what name it was called under, and runs slightly differently in the different cases. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
