Thanks guys. Indeed my raid controller is what they call a 'fakeraid'. And I found some other messages on the web suggesting to just use the linux software raid. So I know what I have to do, but just for my understanding: why are these fakeraids not supported: 1) because it is also software, it is no use to invest in making these raid arrays visible to fedora. the linux software raid is just as performant. OR 2) there is some fundamantal problem that makes it difficult/impossible to make the fakeraid array visible to linux. if so,which problem? OR ... cheers, dirk On Friday 25 August 2006 22:58, Bazooka Joe wrote: > Rich is exactly right. > > I sugest to undo any motherboard raid and use software raid. > > -fastfish > > On 8/25/06, Rich Bishop <rjb38@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > dirk ooms wrote: > > > Hello list, > > > > > > My server has an on-board raid controller (Intel ICH7R) that has one > > > raid 1 array configured (2 SATA disks). The controller uses the Adaptec > > > driver. > > > > > > In the FC5 documentation i read "Each active RAID array appears as one > > > drive within Fedora" (chapter 5), but during the fedora install > > > procedure two drives are detected: sda and sdb. > > > > > > What am i missing? > > > > > > Thanks in advance for any guidance. > > > > > > dirk > > > > The controller probably isn't a truly hardware raid - a number of the > > SATA raid controllers also require a software (driver) component. > > Without this, you'll see both drives even though your BIOS says they're > > raided. We've seen the same thing on some IBM machines (x306?) and > > decided to use linux software (md) raid instead. > > > > Rich > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
