Deepak Shrestha: > Sorry I forgot to mention that I'm not using dial-up. I am using DSL. > My modem router is acting as DHCP server for rest of the network but > I have assigned the static address for my FC5 box because I am serving > a small wiki inside the LAN and planning to use it for public also > using DynDNS. In which case, if you don't run a local DNS server (because you want a DNS server to resolve local host names rather than use hosts files on each PC), it'd be usual to write the ISP's DNS server IP addresses into the modem/router, and configure all PCs to use your router as their DNS server. That way, if your ISP ever changes, all you do is reconfigure the modem/router, all the PCs stay the same. If you do run your own DNS server, for whatever reason, you'd give all your PCs its address for the DNS server IP addresses. You could make your ISP a "forwarder" in the DNS server configuration, if needed. Again, you'd not to change any of the PCs if your ISP changed their DNS server address. And, you wouldn't (probably) need to use their server, at all (that's how I run). > The problem with my other widnows machines unable to connect with my > FC5 box has something to do with the Samba since windows machines uses > NetBIOS names to locate the computer. So when my host name suddenly > changed without any notice, the wiki served from FC5 became unavilable > to windows. If you're behind a modem/router, individual PCs addressing shouldn't change (including hostnames). You've several ways of telling all the PCs on the network what the addresses are for each PC: Your modem/router *may* have a local DNS server, that can provide answers for queries. Some may tie it in with their DHCP server, as a little database. You'd configure all your PCs to use the modem/router as their DNS server. If your modem/router is using DHCP to dole out addresses, it should do that for you, so long as you don't hand configure all the PCs to use some other DNS server. You can run a local DNS server on one of your PCs, configure it with your local network addresses, configure your PCs to use it for their DNS server. Of course that server has to be running all the time. (This is what I do - run my own DNS server, tied into the DHCP server on one of my PCs, so machines configured via DHCP are added to the local DNS server, all automatically.) You can write hosts files on all the PCs, listing all the local machine names and IP addresses. Windows' SMB will look at its lmhosts file first, for SMB/Samba type of networking. It's a *similar* construct to the hosts file, but not quite the same. You can look at the sample lmhosts file on Windows or Linux, or read the lmhosts man file, to see how to make one. Basically, though, it's just the IP address followed by the host name (no list of names and aliases). e.g. 192.168.1.5 printserver Without the above information, Windows PCs will broadcast queries on the network, hoping that the right PC will respond. This generates more traffic (not really significant on small network), and can make things slower to work (it has to find the other machine). Of course, the above needs you to use consistent addresses. If your local PC addresses change, then you can't use the hosts or lmhosts file, they'll have the wrong data. Likewise for manually configured DNS servers. > Actually "127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost" line was > there in my hosts file when I first installed FC5. After that I > changed my hostname, given static IP address, DNS lookup addresses > etc. through the graphical interface to something else like "zeeweb". > Now what happened was it removed the line > "127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost" I've seen that happen. You're not alone. > and replaced with my new setting. > "192.168.1.2 zeeweb" Adding your hostname and LAN IP address to the machine's own hosts file would be a normal thing. Even if you're using DNS, it's handy to have the machine's own address in there (so long as it's a static one). That way, things still work if the DNS server doesn't respond. > As a result in next boot my "sendmail" and "sm_client" took forever to > boot trying to resolve the hostname. This is the problem I posted in: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2006-July/msg01627.html Yes, typically those services, and various others, listen out on the local loopback, as well as others. The local (internal) networking works just within the PC, but in the same way as external networking works (the same processes are involved). It means that services work the same, whichever addresses are used. You can run services on a box with no external networking, at all (mail, HTTP, anything). The local interface (traditionally named "localhost", and additionally as "localhost.localdomain" on Linux - which sometimes have services that would insist on there being at least one dot in the name) is found at the 127.0.0.1 numerical IP address (and often at any address starting with 127.0.0). It's the computer's way of referring to itself, just as you'd refer to yourself as "me" or "I". > The problem was solved by hand editing the /etc/hosts file and adding > the line back again. Now my etc host files have two line and working > well: > =================================== > 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost > 192.168.1.2 zeeweb.locallan.org zeeweb > =================================== > > After few days I changed my hostname (hand edited /etc/hosts file) and > now it looks like this: > =================================== > 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost > 192.168.1.2 zeenet.locallan.org zeenet > =================================== Again, that doesn't "set the hostname". The hostname is set elsewhere. All the hosts file is doing is associating a name with an numerical IP address, and optional aliases (the one word abbreviated names listed after the fully qualified ones with dots in them - you can have several aliases, if you want). e.g. 192.168.1.2 zeenet.locallan.org zeenet zeeweb webserver Of course, the hostname that's set has to match with addresses used by the network, you can't change one and not the other. Not, and have things still work... > Few days ago my ISP's DNS went down and they gave me new set of DNS > look up addresses to use. Since I don't know which file contains the > DNS lookup addresses, I used the graphical interface this time to > change the DNS lookup address. After saving the setting and > reactivating the network, other windows mahcine on the LAN couldn't > reach my FC5 mahcine hosted wiki. I tried to figure out for long time > and found out that my hostname has changed back to the previous > setting. This time again I have to hand edit the /etc/hosts file and > change the host name and all is wokring well again. > > So how do you explain this? Most likely because you'd changed one thing, somewhere, but not everywhere that you need to. In the network configuration GUI, you've got a place to set the hostname for the machine, places to set the hostnames per interfaces, and somewhere to type in the entries for the hosts files (which just tells the TCP/IP stack which addresses are supposed to be related to each other - it doesn't determine which addresses are used by which interfaces). -- (Currently running FC4, in case that's important to the thread) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
