On Wed, 2006-23-08 at 13:42 -0400, Patrick Doyle wrote: > I interpret the 135 MHz as a maximum pixel clock spec. 1280 columns * > 1024 rows = 1,310,720 total pixels per frame. At 135 MHz, this > implies (to me) that you could update (i.e. refresh) the display at a > maximum rate of 103 times per second. I realized this after sending my original message to the list. Once I figured out that the 135 Mhz was the pixel clock, my confusion ended. Thanks for pointing it out. > Just out of curiosity... > What LCD Monitor are you looking at? Does it have a digital interface > to the graphics adapter or an analog interface? Is the digital > interface serial (in which case you need to divide my 103 Hz refresh > rate by 8, 16, or 24 -- yech!) or is the digital interface parallel? > I expect these are all standardized by some DVI specification, but I > have no expertise in that area (if that's not totally obvious by my > post thus far). I was looking at a couple of Samsung and several Viewsonic LCDs. They are all either analog only or dual DVI/Analog. At least now I know they'll work with the on board video in the thin clients (Via EPIA based). > perhaps this helps... probably not :-) I now know a little more about LCDs than I did before I read your message. I will more than likely forget it all quite soon. I still appreciate the reply, though. :) Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4 i686 GNU/Linux 09:13:28 up 2:43, 2 users, load average: 0.75, 0.50, 0.43 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
