Re: x86_64 or i386?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 22:48, Jeff Vian wrote:
 
> Stable means that without changes nothing bad happens.
> Applying a change that does not work is not instability, it is an update
> of a program that failed to function properly.
> 
> You cannot say that a distribution/OS is unstable because you did
> an update to printing and the printing now does not work.

I can and did say that.  If an interface or documented behavior
changes, it is unstable.

> The machine
> still works and the only errors are occurring in the package that was
> changed.  This is not OS instability, it is a package error. 

If that package is the reason you have the machine, it won't
matter much what caused it to break. 

> > I mean that there are times you want new features and changes
> > but you don't want them as a surprise along with things you have
> > to apply like security updates.
> > 
> Then don't do updates.

There are updates you have to do.  Nobody expects code to be
perfect and you do have to apply fixes to the parts that
are broken as shipped.  However, on production machines you
want to minimize introducing new problems.

> Fedora is *supposed* to be bleeding edge and has
> a rapid rate of change across the board.  If you are not willing to
> accept the risk of changes (everywhere -- packages and OS) then do not
> use it. 

Agreed - and that is exactly what I have been saying.

>  Instead use one of the stable distributions that only receive
> the security changes and not the rapid feature updates such as Debian,
> Centos, RHEL, or similar.

Exactly: distributions suitable for use as production servers
separate bug/security fix updates from behavior-changing
updates.   However, with behavior-changing development inherent
in the 2.6 kernel, not even the enterprise distributions can
assure stability.  

> If the new features are important to you then _do not_ complain when
> changes occur.  Instead it is helpful if you have a problem with a
> specific change to identify exactly what went south and to file a
> bugzilla so the developers can fix the problem.
> 
> Complaining does no one any good. 

Yes it does - it serves as a warning to others not to use
whatever just made you complain, at least under the same
circumstances.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux