Re: FC4 and ssh passphrases not working

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:45:04AM -0700, Mike McMullen wrote:
I updated a few of my servers recently with yum. After I did that,
my automated rsyncs to servers stopped working. The updated
servers are refusing the publickeys I've used for months and months.
[...]
Aug 18 08:35:14 mail sshd[25419]: Parsing authorization file
/root/.ssh2/authorization resulted in error (user root tried to
authenticate)
[...]
The version of sshd on the remote server is
"SSH Secure Shell SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.8p1 Debian 1:3.8p1-3 (non-commercial
version) on i686-pc-linux-gnu".
What confuses me is why it says Debian. I use the out of the box yum
configuration so everything
should be for a FC4 configuration.

Are you positive you are connecting to the machine you think you are? Since
you show a log message from the remote machine, presumably you can connect
with some other form of authentication, yeah? What do you get if you do "rpm
-q openssh" on that machine?

--


Hi Matthew,

Thank you for your response. Yes, I am positive I'm on the correct machine. All the
production servers I have are running FC4. I have some development boxes running
FC5. There is only Fedora in our shop. No Debian.

Here is the weird part. I did an "rpm -q openssh" on a server that the publickeys still
work with and got:

openssh-4.2p1-fc4.10

I then did it on one of the servers that has the ssh2 directory and doesn't accept
publickeys and got the same thing:

openssh-4.2p1-fc4.10

However if I do an "sshd -v" on the server where publickeys work I get:

OpenSSH_4.2p1, OpenSSL 0.9.7f 22 Mar 2005

When I do this on a server where the keys don't work I get:

sshd: SSH Secure Shell SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.8p1 Debian 1:3.8p1-3 (non-commercial version) on i686-pc-linux-gnu

Both report the same rpm but it appears sshd is different in each one.

Again, I only use the out of the box repos for updates.

Is it possible I got a bad rpm?

If so, how can I correct this?

Thanks for your help,

Mike







--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux