Lonni J Friedman wrote:
Greetings,
I've got a bunch of kickstart scripts that I use for network based
installations of FC (and RHEL too). One thing that I've noticed is
that for x86_64 installations, where RPMs are provided for both x86_64
and i386 (32bit compatibilty), the 32bit versions just about never get
installed.
I know that I can expliclty specify individual RPM/package names in
the %packages section, however I can't find any information on how to
specify arch.
Is there a way of explicitly specifying the i386 version of the RPM
should be installed along with the x86_64 when doing a kickstart based
installation?
thanks!
The syntax is ok for:
package.i386
There have been a few bugs in anaconda versions that forced this
method. Packages without specifying the arch were just ignored. The
version of anaconda released on the FC4 CDs had this problem.
For best flexibility, you may wish to determine the arch in part of the
preinstall phase, and pass it to a program that can dynamically create
the ks.cfg file for you -- I like a cgi script executed on a web server
for this. Then each of the packages in your list could append the
correct arch at run time.
From the Boot image CD Prompt:
linux ks=http://myserver/cgi-bin/my.cgi?ARCH=x86_64
For example.
In the my.cgi program:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use CGI;
use Socket;
use strict;
...
my $arch = $q->param('ARCH') || "i386";
...
print "#Package install information
\%packages
@ base
-man.$arch
-man-pages.noarch
-rhnlib.noarch
e2fsprogs.$arch
sharutils.$arch
ntp.$arch
\n";
Hope this helps.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
