Roger wrote: > How long did you try running your athlone, hopefully longer than 7 days > and what services were running on it, were they production type > services . > > I was hosting just over 1000 domains on FC5 and with very disastrous > consequences so i have moved away from FC5 and another friend of mine > with a lot more Linux experience tried unsuccessfully to run a > production server on FC5. Why do people making this "bleeding edge" complaint always give such vague information about their problems? What exactly (or even roughly) went wrong with these "1000 domains"? And how does a "production server" work any differently from any other server? Regarding my problem with an Athlon-64 (Targa) machine, I'm pretty sure it has to do with X, as I said, so it is only tangentially related to Fedora. In fact this machine runs Windows-XP most of the time, being used by our Polish au pair to run a program which allows her to talk to and see her friends and relations in Poland who are running the same program at their end. (I think it is called Gadu Gadu.) So I couldn't run FC in text mode for 7 days, but it showed no sign of any problems during the few hours I did run it. I'm pretty sure the problem has something to do with the Xorg Radeon (9600) driver, but as I hardly ever run the machine under Linux it is not worth spending a lot of time on. I expect it will be solved sooner or later by the Xorg people. Actually, I find all these discussions about "stability" rather unreal, as all Windows and Linux distributions seem completely stable to me. (I tried running Minix-3 last week, and that was certainly not stable, as run by me; but I am quite willing to believe I was doing something wrong.) -- Timothy Murphy e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
