Re: module signing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



tomhorsley@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196871 I asked a question
that was never answered. Perhaps someone in the list knows:

What does module signing imply for folks who have their own kernel modules
the build? Will "home brew" kernel modules be unable to load?

If I can't load them, how the devil do I get my custom modules to work again?

If I can load them, what is the point in module signing (which I imagine has
something to do with security)?



http://lwn.net/Articles/92617/ explains this. There is no plans to enforce any restrictions on third party kernel modules being loaded. Hope that helps.


Rahul

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux