Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: LDAP addressbook set up, now need to use it (Paul Howarth)
2. Re: Selinux woes (Paul Howarth)
3. Re: DNS Problem Maybe (Craig Preston)
4. Re: uname (Matthew Miller)
5. Re: Firefox closes without warning (Jonathan Underwood)
6. Re: uname (Kaushal Shriyan)
7. Re: Burning backup to dvd (Anne Wilson)
8. Re: Burning backup to dvd (Anne Wilson)
9. Re: uname (Matthew Miller)
10. Re: LDAP addressbook set up, now need to use it (Gary Stainburn)
11. Re: latest updates don't boot (Chip Old)
12. Re: ssh question (Bruno Wolff III)
13. Re: Burning backup to dvd (Dave M)
14. Re: Burning backup to dvd (Chong Yu Meng)
15. OT:Cybercafe Manager/Timer (sysadmin)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:02:58 +0100
From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LDAP addressbook set up, now need to use it
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <44C89D62.7010107@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I've configured an LDAP addressbook using the openldap-servers rpm and the
> tutorial at
> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2003/03/27/ldap_ab.html
>
> The server's configured and appears to be working, however I can't seem to use
> it.
>
> If I do a ldapsearch I see the two contacts I've added to the server.
> I have configured the Kaddressbook to use the LDAP directory and it shows both
> contacts and their details.
>
> However, in kmail composer when I click on Select the contacts are not there,
> even when I choose the LDAP directory as the addressbook to use.
>
> When I try to use Outlook 2003 or Outlook Express I have the same problem in
> that I don't see any contacts.
>
> Could anyone point me to any possible reasons for this, or how to fix it?
slapd sends query details to syslog; add the following to
/etc/syslog.conf to have ldap logs written to /var/log/ldaplogs:
# slapd logs to local4
local4.* /var/log/ldaplogs
You'll be able to see what the clients are doing in the logs, which
should help with debugging.
Paul.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:05:21 +0100
From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Selinux woes
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <44C89DF1.2050503@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Dan Track wrote:
> On 7/27/06, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Dan Track wrote:
>> > On 7/27/06, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Dan Track wrote:
>> >> > Hi All
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm having trouble running software, especially the cgi scripts. I
>> >> > keep getting the following denial messages:
>> >> >
>> >> > audit(1153994541.663:20): avc: denied { execute_no_trans } for
>> >> > pid=9258 comm="httpd" name="status.cgi" dev=sda2 ino=19426
>> >> > scontext=root:system_r:httpd_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:lib_t
>> >> > tclass=file
>> >> >
>> >> > The files are located in /usr/lib/nagios/cgi/
>> >> >
>> >> > Could some please help me figure this out. I've started to read
>> >> > through the selinux manual but its a huge climb and would appreciate
>> >> > ways to solve the above.
>> >>
>> >> You should read "man httpd_selinux", which has notes on running CGI
>> >> programs under SELinux.
>> >>
>> >> You generally need to set the SELinux context type of CGI programs to
>> >> httpd_sys_script_exec_t:
>> >>
>> >> # chcon -R -t httpd_sys_script_exec_t /usr/lib/nagios/cgi
>> >>
>> >> Is this the nagios version in Fedora Extras? If it is, failure to work
>> >> with SELinux enabled should be bugzilla-ed.
>> >>
>> >> Paul.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> fedora-list mailing list
>> >> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>> >>
>> > Hi Paul,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the reply. I manged the above before I read you rmessage.
>> > Thanks for the heads up though. Would you be able to help on the next
>> > "search" error message.
>>
>> It's being denied access to search the /var/log directory to see what's
>> in it.
>>
>> > Just to add this is a nagios install from source.
>>
>> Is there some particular reason you're not using the package in Extras,
>> which *may* have solved these problems already?
>>
>
> Hi Paul
>
> I downloaded the latest version from nagios. I didn't see the latest
> version in the repository.
>
> Would you what command to run to fix this problem? I ran audit2allow
> and inserted teh rules in local.te, and ran make. I restarted the
> httpd, nagios and syslog daemons but still no joy.
Here's now I approach these problems on FC5:
http://www.city-fan.org/tips/BuildSeLinuxPolicyModules
Paul.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:20:33 +1000
From: "Craig Preston" <duffman23@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: DNS Problem Maybe
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<6842681b0607270420o1712989bi6b29ac50838d6419@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thanks Tod,
Setting the disableIPv6 to true allowed firefox to work. So then I set it
back to false and changed my DSL modem dhcp settings to give out the ISP DNS
rather than just itself. This seems to have fixed the firefox networking
issues.
thanks for the help
Craig
On 27/07/06, Tod Merley <todbot88@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/27/06, Craig Preston <duffman23@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I have a strange problem that seems to be DNS related. From a command
> prompt I can ping an address, say www.google.com and I will get a reponse.
> If I type a web address into the web browser (firefox) it can't resolve the
> name and the connection times out. If I put the IP address in the web
> browser it works and the web page is displayed. This also seems to affect
> yum. If I do a yum update or whatever, it times out and cannot connect to
> the update server.
>
> All my networking settings look correct, it is strange. Any help would be
> appreciated.
>
>
> Craig
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
>
> Hi Craig!
>
> In Firefox do an "about:config" in the URL window. This will take you to
> the internal Firefox configuration screen. In the "Filter" window type
> "dns". You should see "network dns.disableIPv6 " as one of the parameters
> found. Double click on the line to change the value to "True" and then see
> if you can browse by URL name to Google and friends.
>
> If this works for you then look at "/etc/resolv.conf". If you are on a
> DSL line with modem you may see "192.168.0.1" as one of the "namserver"(s)
> in this file (at any rate, look for the IP of the DSL or other modem which I
> am assumeing contains a nameserver as well). Comment out or remove this
> line and then see if you can browse in Firefox with " dns.disableIPv6"
> "False".
>
> If all of this hits, if you can, update the firmware on your modem. If
> you cannot do that, then pray that my scripting skills sharpen and are put
> to the task of editing dhclient.script so it can bypass the local modem's
> nameserver.
>
> Good Hunting!
>
> Tod
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060727/17fc219a/attachment.html
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:21:27 -0400
From: Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: uname
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <20060727112127.GA8430@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 04:26:12PM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> I have a query on uname
> 1)uname -i prints i386
> 2)uname -m prints i686
> whats the difference between this two and why is it printing differently
-m, --machine
print the machine hardware name
-p, --processor
print the processor type
-i, --hardware-platform
print the hardware platform
--
Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:21:54 +0100
From: "Jonathan Underwood" <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Firefox closes without warning
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<645d17210607270421i96094ban7579d7befde3f1d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 26/07/06, Deepak Shrestha <d88pak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to visit this site:
> http://www.dluxproductions.com/webcandy/
>
> but before page loads, firefox closes without any notice. I can visit
> this site from windows (firefox). I have latest firefox 1.5.04 & flash
> installed and working perfectly with other flashed based sites. Is
> there something wrong with fedora version or missing plugin?
I see the same thing, FC-5, firefox 1.5.04. I suggest you file a
bugzilla report.
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:57:50 +0530
From: "Kaushal Shriyan" <kaushalshriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: uname
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<6b16fb4c0607270427m194bd5c8ted599d2cb85bc1bd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 7/27/06, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 04:26:12PM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> > I have a query on uname
> > 1)uname -i prints i386
> > 2)uname -m prints i686
> > whats the difference between this two and why is it printing differently
>
> -m, --machine
> print the machine hardware name
>
> -p, --processor
> print the processor type
>
> -i, --hardware-platform
> print the hardware platform
>
>
> --
> Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
Hi Matthew
I know this using man uname
My query is what is "the machine hardware" name and what is "the
hardware platform
can i have docs saying what is i386,i486,i586 and i686 architecture
Thanks and Regards
Kaushal
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:38:48 +0100
From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Burning backup to dvd
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <200607271238.48268.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Thursday 27 July 2006 04:12, Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:47 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > It looks as though the media was at least part of the problem.
> > Changing to a different brand disk got me a complete burn, no error
> > messages whatsoever. However, I find I cannot read the disk. It is
> > not automounting. For a manual mount, is the type iso9660?
>
> It depends on how you created the disc. Have you tried udf as the type?
>
>
That also returns 'No medium found'.
Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060727/247b1432/attachment.bin
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:42:22 +0100
From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Burning backup to dvd
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <200607271242.22829.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On Thursday 27 July 2006 11:38, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Poohba wrote:
> > growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/dvd=image.iso
> >
> > /dev/dvd should be the drive. mine is /dev/hdc and i just use that
> > instead of symlink'n it
> >
> > growisofs -Z /dev/dvd -R -J /some/files
> > works for me with no problem also. I have never tried to append. I
> > missed a lot of your posts so I don't know what has already been tried.
> > I apologize for any repeated information.
> >
> > gives what error? If it starts at all then the media is fine. If it
> > fails immediately it could be the media unless the error is more
> > specific.
> >
> > On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:13 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 26 July 2006 17:00, Poohba wrote:
> >>> Have you tried growisofs?
> >>
> >> Yes
> >>
>
> This is a bad idea, you should ALWAYS burn DVD's with UDF only, burning
> with ISO is a very bad idea, for instance, if you burn a file > 2GB on an
> ISO, you will only be able to read the first 2GB of it. There are other
> problems as well.
OK, I'm struggling to find disks other than the brand that the burner is
unhappy with - new supply coming tomorrow - but assuming I can find one, what
command do you recommend to get the udf burn? I should also say that this
burner is not so new, and on the same-model burner that I have used a lot I
always use slow speed burning in k3b, so if it's possible to put a speed
limiter in, I would prefer to.
Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060727/db307645/attachment.bin
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:49:19 -0400
From: Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: uname
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <20060727114919.GA9618@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 04:57:50PM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> I know this using man uname
> My query is what is "the machine hardware" name and what is "the
> hardware platform
> can i have docs saying what is i386,i486,i586 and i686 architecture
What specifically do you want to know about them? Does
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/i686> and <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/i386>
cover what you want to know?
--
Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:49:20 +0100
From: Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LDAP addressbook set up, now need to use it
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <200607271249.20535.gary.stainburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On Thursday 27 July 2006 12:02, Paul Howarth wrote:
> Gary Stainburn wrote:
> > Hi folks.
> >
> > I've configured an LDAP addressbook using the openldap-servers rpm and
> > the tutorial at
> > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2003/03/27/ldap_ab.html
> >
> > The server's configured and appears to be working, however I can't seem
> > to use it.
> >
> > If I do a ldapsearch I see the two contacts I've added to the server.
> > I have configured the Kaddressbook to use the LDAP directory and it shows
> > both contacts and their details.
> >
> > However, in kmail composer when I click on Select the contacts are not
> > there, even when I choose the LDAP directory as the addressbook to use.
> >
> > When I try to use Outlook 2003 or Outlook Express I have the same problem
> > in that I don't see any contacts.
> >
> > Could anyone point me to any possible reasons for this, or how to fix it?
>
> slapd sends query details to syslog; add the following to
> /etc/syslog.conf to have ldap logs written to /var/log/ldaplogs:
>
> # slapd logs to local4
> local4.* /var/log/ldaplogs
>
> You'll be able to see what the clients are doing in the logs, which
> should help with debugging.
>
> Paul.
Thanks for this Paul. The problem appears to be with the applications
themselves.
Kaddressbook does a full search as soon as it starts and works.
KMail doesn't even connect to the LDAP server, even when forced to used the
LDAP service.
Outlook Express only seems to do a search if you go into Address Book -> Find
People. It doesn't seem to want to just pull in the list as Kaddressbook does
Outlook 2002 looks like it wants to work properly, but refuses to set the
search base and ignores the values I put into the search base field in the
config window. It therefore doesn't recieve any hits.
Kaddressbook
Jul 27 12:43:51 stan slapd[3348]: conn=38 fd=11 ACCEPT from
IP=10.1.1.115:57617 (IP=0.0.0.0:389)
Jul 27 12:43:51 stan slapd[3348]: conn=38 op=0 BIND dn="" method=128
Jul 27 12:43:51 stan slapd[3348]: conn=38 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text=
Jul 27 12:43:51 stan slapd[3348]: conn=38 op=1 SRCH
base="ou=addressbook,dc=example,dc=com" scope=1 deref=0
filter="(objectClass=*)"
Jul 27 12:43:51 stan slapd[3348]: conn=38 op=1 SRCH attr=l cn description
facsimileTelephoneNumber sn displayName givenName jpegPhoto mail mobile o
pager homePhone postalCode st street telephoneNumber title uid
Jul 27 12:43:51 stan slapd[3348]: conn=38 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0
nentries=3 text=
kmail
<Nothing>
OE (after doing Find People)
Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 fd=11 ACCEPT from IP=10.1.1.25:1475
(IP=0.0.0.0:389)
Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 op=0 BIND dn="" method=128
Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text=
Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 op=1 SRCH
base="ou=addressbook,dc=example,dc=com" scope=2 deref=3 filter="(|(mail=jim*)
(cn=jim*))"
Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 op=1 SRCH attr=display-name cn
commonName mail otherMailbox givenName sn surname st c co organizationName o
ou organizationalUnitName URL homePhone facsimileTelephoneNumber
otherFacsimileTelephoneNumber OfficeFax mobile otherPager OfficePager pager
info title telephoneNumber l homePostalAddress postalAddress streetAddress
street department comment postalCode physicalDeliveryOfficeName initials
conferenceInformation userCertificate;binary userSMIMECertificate;binary
labeledURI Manager Reports IPPhone
Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0
nentries=1 text=
Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 op=2 UNBIND
Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 fd=11 closed
Outlook 2002
Jul 27 12:47:29 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 fd=11 ACCEPT from IP=10.2.9.4:1072
(IP=0.0.0.0:389)
Jul 27 12:47:29 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 op=0 BIND dn="" method=128
Jul 27 12:47:29 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text=
Jul 27 12:47:30 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 op=1 SRCH base="" scope=0 deref=0
filter="(objectClass=*)"
Jul 27 12:47:30 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 op=1 SRCH attr=objectClass
supportedControl supportedCapabilities
Jul 27 12:47:30 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0
nentries=1 text=
Jul 27 12:47:38 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 op=2 UNBIND
Jul 27 12:47:38 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 fd=11 closed
Jul 27 12:47:43 stan slapd[3348]: conn=41 fd=11 ACCEPT from IP=10.2.9.4:1073
(IP=0.0.0.0:389)
Jul 27 12:47:43 stan slapd[3348]: conn=41 op=0 BIND dn="" method=128
Jul 27 12:47:43 stan slapd[3348]: conn=41 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text=
Jul 27 12:48:12 stan slapd[3348]: conn=41 op=1 UNBIND
Jul 27 12:48:12 stan slapd[3348]: conn=41 fd=11 closed
--
Gary Stainburn
This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:38:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Chip Old <fold@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: latest updates don't boot
To: Fedora Users <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.62.0607270829220.21162@mail>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:13 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I eventually got 2157 to boot by editing the init script in the initrd
> image to utterly eradicate all references to the Windows XP raid that I
> don't want to access from linux (but which linux insisted on trying to
> access anyway). If you are actually trying to boot from a raid you need
> to be able to access, the solution isn't as simple. My bugzillas with
> more details about what I did are:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199793
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199831
>
> The bigger bugzilla that has lots of details is:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186842
Thanks Tom. In this case FC5 is the only OS on the box, and we're booting
from the raid array. Apparently Linux kernel 2.6.17.7 has just been
released. This is a production box (one of our DNS servers) so rather
than fool around with 2.6.17-1.2157_FC5smp any more I'll wait for the new
kernel to show up in yum and see what happens with that.
--
Chip Old (Francis E. Old) E-Mail: fold@xxxxxxxx
BCPL Network Administrator Phone: 410-887-6180
BCPL.NET Internet Services Manager FAX: 410-887-2091
320 York Road
Towson, MD 21204-5179 US
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:03:21 -0500
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ssh question
To: bruce <bedouglas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: 'For users of Fedora Core releases' <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <20060727130321.GA30131@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 19:26:18 -0700,
bruce <bedouglas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hi...
>
> research hasn't shown an answer... is there a way to do:
>
> ssh user/passwd@host
As a side note, other processes on your machine can normally see your command
line and so putting passwords on the command line when running any program
is a bad idea if you don't trust all of the process running on your machine.
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:48:37 -0400
From: Dave M <DaveM@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Burning backup to dvd
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <4.2.2.20060727084614.00dc6100@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 07:42 AM 7/27/2006 , Anne wrote:
>I should also say that this
>burner is not so new, and on the same-model burner that I have used a lot
Maybe you should try swapping drives between the box that works and the one
that does not. Maybe it is a hardware problem or maybe the drives have
different versions of firmware.
-------------------------------
Dave M
Davem (at) Mich (dot) Com
Ann Arbor, Mich. USA
Endangered electronic species: http://www.eff.org/endangered/list.php
"The 'Analog Holes' they want to stop up are our eyes, ears and mouths."
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:32:23 +0800
From: Chong Yu Meng <chongym@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Burning backup to dvd
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <1154007143.2794.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 12:38 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday 27 July 2006 04:12, Tim wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:47 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > It looks as though the media was at least part of the problem.
> > > Changing to a different brand disk got me a complete burn, no error
> > > messages whatsoever. However, I find I cannot read the disk. It is
> > > not automounting. For a manual mount, is the type iso9660?
> >
> > It depends on how you created the disc. Have you tried udf as the type?
> >
> >
> That also returns 'No medium found'.
Hi Anne,
I suspect that the problem may have nothing to do with the media or the
way you are executing the growisofs or cdrecord commands. I encountered
the same problems not too long ago, and it turned out to be my DVD drive
that was causing all the problems. I hadn't used the drive in slightly
over a year, and when I tried to burn a DVD on it a couple months ago, I
was getting no medium found, insufficient space error messages, etc.
Almost exactly the same problems you are facing now. I'm not sure if
cleaning the drive is any good. As one list member suggested, as a last
"test" I had taken a hammer to the drive, for wasting more than a week
of my time, the last three DVD disks (coasters now) that I had, and
worst of all, making me doubt the evidence of my eyes. Rather than carry
on experimenting, I'd actually recommend that you buy a new drive -- it
may save your sanity!
--
Pascal Chong
email: chongym@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
web: http://cymulacrum.net
pgp: http://cymulacrum.net/pgp/cymulacrum.asc
"La science ne connaît pas de frontière parce que la connaissance
appartient à l'humanité. et que c'est la flamme qui illumine le monde."
-- Louis Pasteur
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060727/074e8ae4/attachment.bin
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:38:04 +0300
From: sysadmin <sysadmin@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: OT:Cybercafe Manager/Timer
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <44C8B3AC.3040304@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi all.
Kindly is there someone who knows where i can download cybercafe
manager/timer that works in FC.?
I have searched the net for the last two weeks with no luck. All that am
getting are "M$ windoze" related/based..!
Thanks.
------------------------------
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 29, Issue 239
********************************************
