Use FC3 or higher on Dell Poweredge Servers. I use the exact same setup you have and it works very well. Hardware raid will not work however. I began with FC3 and since have since updated straight to FC5 nicely. -----Original Message----- From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 5:06 AM To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 30, Issue 16 Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Which FC for a Dell poweredge server? (Graham Cossey) 2. Re: Which FC for a Dell poweredge server? (Anthony Messina) 3. Re: skype (luca porcu) 4. Re: skype (luca porcu) 5. how to create a vi macro (Jerin Jacob K) 6. Re: skype (Fran?ois Patte) 7. Re: skype (luca porcu) 8. Process memory question. (Dan Track) 9. Intel 3945ABG Wireless (Craig Preston) 10. Re: Intel 3945ABG Wireless (Andy Green) 11. Re: Intel 3945ABG Wireless (Craig Preston) 12. Re: Process memory question. (Andy Green) 13. Re: How to use Apache 2 with HTTPS only? (Vinicius) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:27:36 +0100 From: "Graham Cossey" <graham.cossey@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Which FC for a Dell poweredge server? To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <aed6dd610608020127q3cf53679r1836dc7b669f3b88@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 8/2/06, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Graham Cossey schrieb: > > > I'm thinking about FC4 but as this is a development/test server the > > primary objective is that anything running on this MUST also run on > > the live server installed with RH3 ES-13.8.3 > > > > I will of course ensure that the versions of PHP and MySQL etc match > > the live server. > > Probably it is then best to get CentOS 3, which is an RHEL3 "clone". > RHEL3 is based on ancient Red Hat Linux 9 and thus any Fedora release > will be more or less different. > Is the intended hardware RHEL3 certified? It then will run using CentOS > 3 too. > I was wondering if older distros (like FC2 or those based on RH9) would support the likes of SATA drives. -- Graham ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:33:09 -0500 From: Anthony Messina <amessina@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Which FC for a Dell poweredge server? To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <44D06345.8090401@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Graham Cossey wrote: > On 8/2/06, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Graham Cossey schrieb: >> >> > I'm thinking about FC4 but as this is a development/test server the >> > primary objective is that anything running on this MUST also run on >> > the live server installed with RH3 ES-13.8.3 >> > >> > I will of course ensure that the versions of PHP and MySQL etc match >> > the live server. >> >> Probably it is then best to get CentOS 3, which is an RHEL3 "clone". >> RHEL3 is based on ancient Red Hat Linux 9 and thus any Fedora release >> will be more or less different. >> Is the intended hardware RHEL3 certified? It then will run using CentOS >> 3 too. >> > I was wondering if older distros (like FC2 or those based on RH9) > would support the likes of SATA drives. > > i have 3 dell servers here, all poweredges: SC600, 800, 1800. all run without problems with fc3-fc5. -- Anthony http://messinet.com http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/14a5874d/signature.bin ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:37:24 +0200 From: "luca porcu" <thedjpig@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: skype To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <979e72a80608020137t5fbda272qc36a809764c5d531@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > I tried this in my .asoundrc: > > pcm.!card0 { > type plug > slave.pcm "dmixer" > } > > pcm.dmixer { > type dmix > ipc_key 1024 > slave { > pcm "hw:1,0" > period_time 0 > period_size 1024 > buffer_size 4096 > rate 44100 > } > bindings { > 0 0 > 1 1 > } > } > > ctl.dmixer { > type hw > card 0 > } > > And it seems to work (just simple tests made). Maybe there is a better > solution? I don't know much about ALSA. Hi, repeat: I use Skype with out .asoundrc or other configuration of dmix! try skype with out .asoundrc! lu -- Il termine Hacker Gli hacker sono delle persone dedicate all'elevato ideale di rendere la tecnologia accessibile a tutti, persone dedite al culto della bellezza e decise ad aiutare gli altri grazie alla potenza tecnologica. www.lucaporcu.com ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:37:24 +0200 From: "luca porcu" <thedjpig@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: skype To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <979e72a80608020137t5fbda272qc36a809764c5d531@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > I tried this in my .asoundrc: > > pcm.!card0 { > type plug > slave.pcm "dmixer" > } > > pcm.dmixer { > type dmix > ipc_key 1024 > slave { > pcm "hw:1,0" > period_time 0 > period_size 1024 > buffer_size 4096 > rate 44100 > } > bindings { > 0 0 > 1 1 > } > } > > ctl.dmixer { > type hw > card 0 > } > > And it seems to work (just simple tests made). Maybe there is a better > solution? I don't know much about ALSA. Hi, repeat: I use Skype with out .asoundrc or other configuration of dmix! try skype with out .asoundrc! lu -- Il termine Hacker Gli hacker sono delle persone dedicate all'elevato ideale di rendere la tecnologia accessibile a tutti, persone dedite al culto della bellezza e decise ad aiutare gli altri grazie alla potenza tecnologica. www.lucaporcu.com ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:11:26 +0530 From: Jerin Jacob K <jerinjacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: how to create a vi macro To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1154508086.10690.25.camel@jerin> Content-Type: text/plain Hi all I want to create a vi macro for "+y and "+gP commands . and it has to work on visual mode of vi i tried something like this but it is not working :map c "+y :map v "+gP Waiting for your inputs ... Regards, Jerin Jacob ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:12:57 +0530 From: Fran?ois Patte <francois.patte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: skype To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <44D06591.5000300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 luca porcu a écrit : > > Hi, > repeat: > > I use Skype with out .asoundrc or other configuration of dmix! > > try skype with out .asoundrc! In that case, it doesn't work! What is your /etc/asound.conf ? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Université Paris 5 - Paris http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:46:36 +0200 From: "luca porcu" <thedjpig@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: skype To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <979e72a80608020146y58698c08n121be89a95e97889@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > I use Skype with out .asoundrc or other configuration of dmix! > > > > try skype with out .asoundrc! > > In that case, it doesn't work! What is your /etc/asound.conf ? Do you have set ALSA in the audio option ini skype? # more /etc/asound.conf #Generated by system-config-soundcard, do not edit by hand #SWCONF #DEV 0 defaults.pcm.card 0 defaults.pcm.device 0 defaults.ctl.card 0 -- Il termine Hacker Gli hacker sono delle persone dedicate all'elevato ideale di rendere la tecnologia accessibile a tutti, persone dedite al culto della bellezza e decise ad aiutare gli altri grazie alla potenza tecnologica. www.lucaporcu.com ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:16:11 +0100 From: "Dan Track" <dan.track@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Process memory question. To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <9d5ddd1f0608020216u57903966nb5389e222b85daad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Hi Could someone please help me find a way to find out how much memory a process is using, my question relates specifically to the analog running wild on my server. Thanks Dan ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 19:44:57 +1000 From: "Craig Preston" <duffman23@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Intel 3945ABG Wireless To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <6842681b0608020244y175712bctb80d78aa153a3922@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I have a laptop with an Intel 3945abg Wireless adaptor, and I'm having a bugger of a time getting it working. Has anyone else got these going? I have downloaded the linux drivers from the intel site and the ieee drivers. I am having trouble getting the intel files to make. They fail with error 2. How descriptive :) Any help appreciated -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/95af3f02/attachment.html ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:47:32 +0100 From: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Intel 3945ABG Wireless To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <44D074B4.50403@xxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Craig Preston wrote: > I have a laptop with an Intel 3945abg Wireless adaptor, and I'm having a > bugger of a time getting it working. Has anyone else got these going? I > have downloaded the linux drivers from the intel site and the ieee > drivers. I am having trouble getting the intel files to make. They fail > with error 2. How descriptive :) > > Any help appreciated Yep I'm working good with the current ipw3945 stuff and current FC5 kernel. FWIW on the current kernel, I did not have to update the ieee stuff IIRC. Do you have kernel-smp-devel or kernel-devel package installed beforehand? -Andy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 4492 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/f581c4f7/smime.bin ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 19:57:56 +1000 From: "Craig Preston" <duffman23@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Intel 3945ABG Wireless To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <6842681b0608020257x7828a8cas719f587a20d34f13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Yes I had the kernel-dev package installed. On 02/08/06, Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Craig Preston wrote: > > > I have a laptop with an Intel 3945abg Wireless adaptor, and I'm having a > > bugger of a time getting it working. Has anyone else got these going? I > > have downloaded the linux drivers from the intel site and the ieee > > drivers. I am having trouble getting the intel files to make. They fail > > with error 2. How descriptive :) > > > > Any help appreciated > > Yep I'm working good with the current ipw3945 stuff and current FC5 > kernel. FWIW on the current kernel, I did not have to update the ieee > stuff IIRC. > > Do you have kernel-smp-devel or kernel-devel package installed beforehand? > > -Andy > > > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/1b6b2be4/attachment.html ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:00:35 +0100 From: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Process memory question. To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <44D077C3.70004@xxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Dan Track wrote: > Hi > > Could someone please help me find a way to find out how much memory a > process is using, my question relates specifically to the analog > running wild on my server. top and then press Shift-M will give some idea. You can get a buttload of good info on a particular process from its Process ID number. Eg, for PID 18053 cat /proc/18053/status Name: ekiga State: S (sleeping) SleepAVG: 97% Tgid: 18053 Pid: 18053 PPid: 3249 TracerPid: 0 Uid: 500 500 500 500 Gid: 500 500 500 500 FDSize: 256 Groups: 14 500 VmPeak: 118920 kB VmSize: 118432 kB VmLck: 0 kB VmHWM: 23592 kB VmRSS: 23292 kB VmData: 18504 kB VmStk: 84 kB VmExe: 900 kB VmLib: 35996 kB VmPTE: 220 kB StaBrk: 081a2000 kB Brk: 09571000 kB StaStk: bfe32e20 kB Threads: 10 SigQ: 0/20329 SigPnd: 0000000000000000 ShdPnd: 0000000000000000 SigBlk: 0000000000000000 SigIgn: 0000000000000000 SigCgt: 000000018c005ef3 CapInh: 0000000000000000 CapPrm: 0000000000000000 CapEff: 0000000000000000 Cpus_allowed: ffffffff Mems_allowed: 1 For all these though, understand that shared libs get counted for every process, exploding the total figures given for all processes compared to actual global memory usage. -Andy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 4492 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/10f62a2b/smime.bin ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 07:04:43 -0300 From: Vinicius <cviniciusm@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: How to use Apache 2 with HTTPS only? To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <eaptca$dtp$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Tim escreveu: > Vinicius: >>>> I did do "RedirectPermanent / https://myserver.com/";, but the site is >>>> presenting an error. > > Tim: >>> Which one? The redirecting HTTP one, or the HTTPS one they're directed >>> to? > > You haven't answered the above. Which part of the server is presenting > the error. > It's in the past now. When I disabled the "Listen" and the "RedirectPermanent" directives then both the server and the client are working fine with HTTPS. The server is only serving HTTPS. > >>>> Both the server and the client use certificates issued by a local CA, >>>> and I created a SSLRequire rule to allow only the client to enter the >>>> site. I think the SSL check failed because of the RedirectPermanent. > >>> More details needed. Server configuration, the specific redirection >>> rules, at least. > > > Vinicius: >> Hello, >> >> I did do the following: >> 1. created a CA certificate; >> 2. created a server certificate signed by the CA; >> 3. created a client certificate, CA as root; Imported it to Firefox; >> 4. created a "SSLRequire" rule to allow only this specific client to >> enter the site. It checks the O, OU and the CN. >> 5. disabled the "Listen" Directive for HTTP. > > In what way did you "disable" it? I seem to recall that if you don't > have one, you end up with defaults. > >> Now, I would like to use DAV, but the application DAVExplorer's >> (DAVExplorerSSL.sh) authentication fails with the message: "Connection >> error: javavx.net.ssl.SSLPeerUnverifiedException: peer not >> authenticated". I have entered the address https://localhost/upload . >> >> The snippet of httpd.conf regarding DAV: >> " >> <Directory /var/www/upload> >> Dav On >> AuthName "Top Secret" >> AuthUserFile /var/davpasswd >> AuthType Basic >> </Directory> >> " > > I'd fix other problems before starting on a new one, but basic > authentication and HTTPS aren't compatible with each other. > I have heard that's possible to use DAV and SSL together. Any ideas, pl'ease? TIA, Vinicius. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060802/21e88b16/signature.bin ------------------------------ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 30, Issue 16 ******************************************* -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
