On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 07:49, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 05:37:43PM +0500, Waqas Toor wrote: > > i guess now there is no need to learn structured language , because as the > > languages are evolving they are going towards OOP designs and concepts. i > > guess its more disciplined to program in OOP. > > Depends what you're doing. Object-oriented languages never really caught on > for systems programming. (Although many of the good practices and techniques > from OOP are borrowed.) Yes, if you do anything complicated in C, you end up with your basic data type being 'array of struct ...', a data object of sorts, perhaps with some function pointers in there too. However, it is just a very different way of thinking when the only way you can access data is through a method provided by someone else's object instead of your own function. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list