On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 13:58 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 01:38, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > The big problem I found with the other RPM packaged (for > Centos) version was that it moved things to non-standard > locations so contributed add-ons like Asset Tracker > would not install. Well, the way rt is packaged in FE is supposed to be compliant to the FHS, GCS, the Fedora Packaging Guidelines, and is a valid rt3 configuration without any special tweaks applied. If "add-ons" can't cope with it, they are simply bugged. > The Centos version First of all, I don't care what Centos OS does ... also, I could not find any package on centos.org, so I presume you are referring to a 4th party packaging something. > also has a separate rt-mail-dispatcher package > that lets you set up rt.yourdomain.com This would require to setup a virtual domain and to somehow reflect this virtual domain to DNS. This is way beyond what any rpm can do and will always require manual sysadmin intervention. > and then mail to > queuename@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx without having to add aliases > for every queue. I strongly doubt this rpm to be functional. Ralf -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
