Re: spca5xx freezes system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> On 7/16/06, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Being paid is a requirement for _expecting_ professional behavior. You
>> may
>> be pleasantly surprised to receive it from someone volunteering their
>> time
>> to work on a project, but it's arrogant and rude to *expect* service.
> 
> Sorry, but no.  There's nothing arrogant nor rude about expecting
> someone to reply to your email.  If this guy doesn't want to reply to
> people, he shouldn't have his email plastered all over the website, or
> at the very least he should include a disclaimer that he doesn't have
> time to reply to everyone.
> 
> Its disapointing that anyone thinks its acceptable behavior to ignore
> emails.
> 
You must not get very many e-mails. While it may be unacceptable to
ignore e-mail from someone you know, ignoring e-mail from a stranger
is another story. This is especially true when you get over a 100
e-mails a day. You do not have time to answer them all, so you
answer the ones from people you know first, and then you answer the
ones that interest you from the rest. If you tried to answer every
e-mail, you would not have time to do anything else.

Unless you are paying for there time, you have no right to expect
people to give you some of it. You may ask for it, but they are
under no obligation to give it to you. This is especially true when
you send a message to their e-mail address instead of asking on a
mailing list. But even on a mailing list, you should not expect a
specific person to respond.

Another thing to keep in mind is that a lot of people run mail
filters. If the message is not from someone they know, and is not
from a mailing list they are subscribed to, the message may sit for
a long time before it even gets looked at. This is especially true
e-mail addresses for addressed posted on web sites, or used on
mailing lists. After all, most of the messages that don't match any
of the filtering rules are going to be SPAM anyway.

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux