On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 22:45 +0930, Tim wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 07:56 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > > After some bad experiences in FC5, I propose to > > make /boot/grub/grub.conf a link to /boot/grub/menu.lst > > (I edited /boot/grub/menu.lst, but this had no effect until > > removing /boot/grub/grub.conf and linking it to /boot/grub/menu.lst). > > And, like the others, it's also already like that for FC4 To my surprise I found that the above statement is true. Could someone explain why we need /boot/grub/menu.lst and /etc/grub.conf both as soft links to /boot/grub/grub.conf. Was this created by the "Department of Redundancy Department? :-) -- ======================================================================= This was the ultimate form of ostentation among technology freaks -- to have a system so complete and sophisticated that nothing showed; no machines, no wires, no controls. - Michael Swanwick, "Vacuum Flowers" ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
