>T. Horsnell wrote:
>>> T. Horsnell wrote:
>>>> 1. I seem to have some duplicate package names (this is on an x86_64
>>>> system which has only been 'up2date'ed once immediately after
>>>> installation) e.g:
>>>>
>>>> [root@ls1 ~]$ rpm -q tcp_wrappers
>>>> tcp_wrappers-7.6-37.2
>>>> tcp_wrappers-7.6-37.2
>>> You may have both x86_64 and i386 versions installed.
>>>
>>> Try:
>>>
>>> $ rpm -q --qf '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n' tcp_wrappers
>>
>> Aha. I do indeed have both i386 and x86_64 versions installed for the ones
>> which rpm -V is complaining about. But why does this confuse rpm?
>
>I wouldn't have thought it would.
>
>> Can I tell it to only do one sort?
>
>Try:
>$ rpm -V tcp_wrappers.i386
>$ rpm -V tcp_wrappers.x86_64
>
I just did this.
$ rpm -V tcp_wrappers.x86_64 reports no errors
$ rpm -V tcp_wrappers.i386 complains.
Getting warm here.
$rpm -ql tcp_wrappers-7.6-37.2.i386
[root@ls1 ~]$ rpm -ql tcp_wrappers-7.6-37.2.i386
/usr/include/tcpd.h
/usr/lib/libwrap.a
/usr/lib/libwrap.so
/usr/lib/libwrap.so.0
/usr/lib/libwrap.so.0.7.6
/usr/sbin/safe_finger
/usr/sbin/tcpd
/usr/sbin/try-from
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/BLURB
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/Banners.Makefile
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/CHANGES
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/DISCLAIMER
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/README
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/README.IRIX
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/README.NIS
/usr/share/man/man3/hosts_access.3.gz
/usr/share/man/man5/hosts.allow.5.gz
/usr/share/man/man5/hosts.deny.5.gz
/usr/share/man/man5/hosts_access.5.gz
/usr/share/man/man5/hosts_options.5.gz
/usr/share/man/man8/tcpd.8.gz
[root@ls1 ~]$ rpm -ql tcp_wrappers-7.6-37.2.x86_64
/usr/include/tcpd.h
/usr/lib64/libwrap.a
/usr/lib64/libwrap.so
/usr/lib64/libwrap.so.0
/usr/lib64/libwrap.so.0.7.6
/usr/sbin/safe_finger
/usr/sbin/tcpd
/usr/sbin/try-from
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/BLURB
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/Banners.Makefile
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/CHANGES
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/DISCLAIMER
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/README
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/README.IRIX
/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/README.NIS
/usr/share/man/man3/hosts_access.3.gz
/usr/share/man/man5/hosts.allow.5.gz
/usr/share/man/man5/hosts.deny.5.gz
/usr/share/man/man5/hosts_access.5.gz
/usr/share/man/man5/hosts_options.5.gz
/usr/share/man/man8/tcpd.8.gz
So if rpm is computing the md5sum of the installed binaries and
comparing it to that stored in the rpm database, does it check
whether the installed binary is i386 or x86_64?
T.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
