At 1:10 PM +0200 6/18/06, J.L. Coenders wrote: >Dear list, > >I have a problem. >Smartd reports that I have bad sectors on my disk. I have tried checking it >with badblocks which also reports bad sectors. >I believe I have heard it is possible to repair this in a software manner. Is >this true, or do I need to buy a new disk? > >Btw, fsck does not report any problems. It is normal for modern large disks to occasionally have some bad sectors. Most people never check and don't notice them. By default, if the data can be recovered, the disk automatically remaps that sector (as Mikkel notes: if that feature is turned on). If the data can't be recovered, the sector is put on a list to be remapped the next time it is written to. Writing to bad sectors will "fix" them, but their data is lost. Many (all) modern disks can automatically scan the disk and remap bad sectors as they fail. This improves the chances that the sector will still be readable, and that the remapping will succeed. This is controlled by SMART and smartctl. It can make the disk a bit slower. []# smartctl --offlineauto=on /dev/hdwhatever SMART will also tell you if the disk has too many bad sectors, or other problems, though SMART only claims to give a few hours warning of impending failure. []# smartctl --all /dev/hdwhatever See "man smartctl", and, of course, "man smartd". One needs backups to recover from disk failures, even just uncorrectable bad sectors. There must be some tool to map a bad blocks list to the affected files, but I don't know what it is. ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/> -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list