Re: Red Hat CEO Szulik Looks Forward

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 05:33 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
nicola -kOoLiNuS- losito wrote:
Il giorno sab, 17/06/2006 alle 05.45 -0400, taharka ha scritto:
In this UpFront podcast, Red Hat Chairman, president and CEO Matthew
Szulik talks with eWeek Editorial Director Eric Lundquist about Red
Hat's purchase of JBoss, the future of open source and Szulik's interest
in reviving the U.S. education system.

Podcast download in MP3 format at;
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1978108,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03129TX1K0000616
Uhm ...
Houston, seems we've got a problem :-)

[hint: mp3 thing up over there]
And your RealPlayer can't play it?

Firefox called up the mplayer plugin, which worked just fine. My problem with this is more religious than anything else.

Why, for heavens sake, should the president of RedHat, who does not ship an mp3 capability in any distribution for patent reasons, allow this to be offered on the net in that format, when there are good alternatives in the form of ogg, which I suspect FC5 comes preconfigured to play just fine.

That it was allowed, speaks volumes for his 'commitment' to open source.
----
could you be any more of a schmuck?

He doesn't have any control over the formats that eweek uses to put
content on the Internet.

Craig

Craig, you've not been exactly an angel in tossing out insults in the past, so I'll just consider the source and let the schmuck thing ride.

And I'd wager that had he been aware of it, he may have been able to exert some influence over eweeks postings. However, I doubt the subject (ogg vs mp3) ever crossed his mind as there are more important fish to fry in terms of his daily grind. Its just one of the niggling little details that someone in his position just assumes has been properly delegated.

If you want that to be an apology, take it that way as its as close as you'll get from me on this particular subject. It was a detail that *should* have been handled, and wasn't. OTOH, if he wanted to make sure the winderz folks could play it, then he did indeed make his point and I'm just preaching to the choir. In any event, other than calling attention to an apparent up-yours to open source, this discussion is fruitless.

--
Cheers, Gene

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux