On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:24:52 -0500 Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Please research the history of RIPEM and the reason the fgmp > library exists. This was an attempt to make a free distribution > that used, but did not include, the gpl'd gmp library and did > include some code under a different license. The FSF used > legal threats to stop distribution. Nothing has changed > in their interpretation since then in spite of the bad press > they got from interfering with another free project. You refuse to acknowledge your incorrect assumptions once again. The RIPEM project linked to a GPL library. If it didn't want to obseve the rules of the GPL it shouldn't have linked to a GPL library. It's very simple to understand if you happen to not have a mental impairment. > None of those use GPL'd libraries or you are correct, they would > either be GPL'd or more likely not exist. When built on platforms > with gcc and it's supporting LGPL libraries they will include > some LGPL parts but that is different. Yes, people are free to release their code under the LGPL when that is appropriate. But when they release it under the GPL you have to AGREE to the terms or go elsewhere. Sean -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
