Beartooth wrote:
I dunno whether I never saw it, or did and forgot; I'm sure I should
know, but don't: does FC have a numbering convention like some apps
Don't think so. Each release is just more "bleeding-edge" than the
previous. :)
I seem to have a lot more trouble running odd-numbered FCs than even?
I guess you're just born lucky. :)
Seriously though, a lot of it has to do with the kernel. Later updates
usually fix it though (but introduce a whole new set of problems).
IME eventually you'll find a kernel release that WorksForYou®. Also,
just as "prelink" was a big problem in previous releases (fault lay
mainly with static libs in other installed packages, but all fixed now
AFAIK), SELinux seems to be having the same kind of teething/transition
problems on FC5. Policy updates are being released regularly though, and
of course you can just turn it off if you want, but just like prelink, I
think eventually it will all settle down.
-
K.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
