bruce <bedouglas <at> earthlink.net> writes: > > > why do you suggest fc5? > > at the same time, what version of rhel is the latest? > > is there a way to get a the source srpms for rhel? or should one take a look > at centos? > > thanks > > -bruce > > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-list-bounces <at> redhat.com > [mailto:fedora-list-bounces <at> redhat.com]On Behalf Of Rex Dieter > Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 1:32 PM > To: fedora-list <at> redhat.com > Subject: Re: FC4 or FC5 > > bruce wrote: > > given the state of things right now.. should someone use FC4 of go ahead > and > > go to FC5? > > FC5. > > > also, can someone who's knowlegable tell me which version of RHEL is > > comparable to FC4 and/or FC5? > > The latest, RHEL4 is actually closest to FC3. > ---------------Reply--------------- RHEL_4 is closest to FC3, and maybe 4. Their guide is - - work on CURRENT Fedora goes into NEXT RHEL version. Centos keeps up with CURRENT RHEL, but does not offer support, as does RedHat. As for choosing between FC4 & FC5, FC4 is more stable, except with "Xen", the VM software. FC5 has ver_3.0 which will even let you host MS Windows on top of Linux. Those are basically the choices you have in that area. - - Benster! - - -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
