On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:24:32 +0000 (UTC), Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> opined: > David Cary Hart <Fedora <at> TQMcube.com> writes: > > I am changing to a virtual dedicated web host. My choices are FC2 > > or Centos 4. Anyone have any strong opinions either way? > > I'd go with Centos 4. Fedora only really works well if you're > staying up to date, if they're offering you FC2 _now_, they > definitely aren't. And Centos 4 is actually more up to date than > FC2 (it's about FC3-level in package versions). > > Kevin Kofler > Thanks. That makes sense. What they are saying is "The holdup has been lack of NPTL support in UML kernels preventing FC4 from running." I thought that issue was resolved in newer UML kernels. Indeed the current release is for FC5. -- Do NOT Send Email to <spam trap> Fedora@TQMcube,com Our DNSRBL - Eliminate Spam: http://www.TQMcube.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
