On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 13:22 -0700, Joel Gomberg wrote:
Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote:
Frankly, if it wasn't for Beagle and the clock, I wouldn't have anything
to do with Evolution on this system - I'd much prefer it that way.
I don't use Evolution - I don't want Evolution - but I have to install
it for it's dependants.
Which ones specifically?
$ rpm -q --whatrequires evolution
no package requires evolution
The FC5 RPM has Evolution as a dependency for Beagle, but Beagle can be
compiled without evo. That's what I've done. I wish the Fedora
maintainer would eliminate the dependency so that I could install Beagle
with the RPM. I'm not going to install Evolution just to satisfy a
non-existent requirement.
$ rpm -q --requires beagle|grep evo
mono(evolution-sharp) = 2.0.0.0
$ rpm -q --requires evolution-sharp|grep evo
evolution-data-server
$ rpm -q --requires evolution-data-server|grep evo
"Nonexistent requirement" indeed.
----
You should know the mantra...
it ain't a bug if it ain't in bugzilla
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla
The converse is not true, however...
Craig
--
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
