Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 14:26 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: >> 1. Extras really should not be regarded as a "second class citizen" to >> Core in the first place, and > I wouldn't be sure. Though I on one hand agree that RH's work on KDE has > not been a "proof of exellence", on the other hand, I think, a couple of > overly ambitious KDE hackers in Extras could be harmful. It's not just those "overly ambitious KDE hackers" though. Remember that Extras packages must go through a strict community review of packaging quality and must follow strict and specific guidelines to pass this. Also, nearly every extras packager (as I understand it) watches the fedora-extras-commits list, and so we as a community could quickly pick out if and/or when a packager is doing something inappropriately or incorrectly. > 3. It would close out RH from a technology, other Linux distributors > consider to be essential. - If RH's management thinks they can afford > discoupling from KDE, ... future will tell who's right and who's wrong. No it wouldn't. Extras and Core go hand-in-hand. If KDE were in Extras, the same `yum groupinstall KDE` (for example*) could be used as if it were in Core, since both repositories are enabled by default. Also, with some of the planned Yum-based goodness in Anaconda, one could easily install the distro with an up-to-date KDE just as simply as (or even simpler than?) if it were on the downloaded installer disc(s). > 4. It would close out KDE apps from Core. > So, I'd recommend somebody to write a central, essential application in > based on KDE, and RH will be in trouble. There are several "central [and] essential" GNOME applications in Extras too (for example, the Sabayon administration tool). Remember that all potential packages that may end up in Core one day *must* go through Extras first. (* I'm just presuming that this is the right command for simplicity's sake.) -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
