On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 15:49 -0400, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 13:19 -0400, Dan wrote: > > > > > > > > I agree, I also have preferred lilo. I don't know why someone would > > > make the move wholesale to Grub with such a massive gorilla as a RAID1 > > > bug in the room, doesn't make sense to me. Lilo has always performed > > > well with RAID0 and RAID1 combos and I've never been able to get grub to > > > install correctly in those scenarios. > > > > > > I'm getting ready to find out wether FC5's grub will handle /boot RAID1 > > > and RAID0 on the remainder of the partitions. FC3 did not perform in > > > that regard. I'm going to be mightily peeved if FC5 grub does not > > > function via RAID. > > > > > > LX > > > > > Well, for one, grub can easily handle fakeraid 0 and 1 in FC5. :) > > -Dan > > > > Which won't be helping me much since I do software raid. Well, I don't know about RAID0, but I've been very happy with GRUB and software RAID1 and RAID5 partitions since FC3. -- Brian Gaynor www.pmccorp.com FC4/Linux on DELL Inspiron 5160 3.0Ghz canis 14:28:48 up 5:59, 1 user, load average: 0.21, 0.26, 0.20 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
