On Tuesday, May 23rd 2006 at 10:37 -0700, quoth Brian D. McGrew:
=>Good morning,
=>
=>I'm looking to tighten up my ssh configuration. I have to have SSH open
=>on the box at home so I can get to it from the office. I've found
=>several articles on securing ssh that include deny root access and
=>require 'wheel' group membership for su.
=>
=>Is changing the port to something non-standard a good idea? What else
=>can I do; can someone point me to a good write up on it?
=>
=>Thanks,
=>
=>:b!
=>
=>Brian D. McGrew { brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx || brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx }
Brian, I have the same situation as you. I have a box running at home with
a *very* limited number of people who need to access it. Instead of
cluttering up my syslog with 3digits worth of scriptkiddies hitting my
port 22, I just changed the port nr to something else. (Pick a number
between 1 and 0xFFFFFFFF) Problem solved. It's not a "security thrrough
obscurity" solution. ssh is already as tight as I need AFAICT. All we're
talking about is dealing with the loony robots.
--
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
