Ahaha, so if I understand you the strace output is huge for the dynamic one and smaller for the static one?
Yes, but it is no huge, just a little bit bigger. Only several lines greater, those I wrote in the previous message.
Can you post an example of one of the "10 million" syscalls that is present in the strace output for the dynamic case (if I understood you correctly)?
There is no trace for individual syscalls (supposing rand() function is really a syscall ...) in the trace output.
There are some magic things down /proc/sys/kernel/ that you might want to meddle with to see if they affect the situation. Eg echo "0" >/proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space echo "0" >/proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield
The original values for these files were "1". I set them to "0" as you told me. These are the results: # ./dynamic-test-cpu-2 ... 10 M de rand() en 44.840 sec (example.: 93862647) ... # echo "0" >/proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space # ./dynamic-test-cpu-2 ... 10 M de rand() en 44.800 sec (example.: 1936430894) ... # echo "0" >/proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield # ./dynamic-test-cpu-2 ... 10 M de rand() en 44.800 sec (example.: 677622031) ... I am afraid the problem is still present.
Another idea, perhaps to to give a static libm and keep the dynamic libc stuff eg gcc blah.c /usr/lib/libm.a not sure if that will work but worth a try. Then the ldd for the resulting binary should no longer reference libm.
Ok. I compile it with libm this way: gcc test-cpu-2.c -o libm-test-cpu-2 /usr/lib/libm.a -lm -O3 Obtaining: # file ./libm-test-cpu-2 ./libm-test-cpu-2: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, not stripped These are the results: # ./libm-test-cpu-2 Reservado 0.1 Gb de memoria en 0.000 segundos Escritura sobre 0.1 Gb de memoria en 0.230 segundos 10 M de rand() en 44.800 sec (example.: 3392997) 10 M de sqrt(i) en 0.180 sec (example.: 3162) 10 M de log(i) en 0.920 sec (example.: 16) 10 M de log10(i) en 0.950 sec (example.: 6) ... So identical results in rand() but worst results in other mathematical functions. Doing top meanwhile Fedora is executing (static/dynamic/libm)_test-cpu-2 gives always a load of 1.05 more or less. So the CPU is working at full throttle in every case. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
