Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH ; to set or not to set....

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > I created them manually and reran ldconfig. Still does not work as a
> > service or terminal application. 
> > 
> > The I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable and ran it in the
> > terminal, didn't work. 
> > 
> > Copied the files back over, and reran the application (same terminal
> > with LD_LIBRARY_PATH set), now it runs again. 
> > 
> > One thing I can say is that the .so files are different sizes than the
> > other files. 
> 
> Are they? The ones you reported as working last time looked the same 
> size to me. Supposing you let ldconfig create the .so.28 links and you 
> leave everything else as-is? Does that work?
> 
> Paul.
> 

Some do not have accompanying so.28.0 and so.28 files. The other files,
the ones that had so.28.0 and so.28 files along side, were all the same
size. 

How can I see what ldconfig thinks is there? Is that ldconfig -p?

It shows these files:
libjlicapi63.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libjlicapi63.so
libicuuc28.so.28 (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libicuuc28.so.28
libicuuc28.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libicuuc28.so
libicutoolutil28.so.28 (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libicutoolutil28.so.28
libicutoolutil28.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libicutoolutil28.so
libiculx28.so.28 (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libiculx28.so.28
libiculx28.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libiculx28.so
libicule28.so.28 (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libicule28.so.28
libicule28.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libicule28.so
libicui18n28.so.28 (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libicui18n28.so.28
libicui18n28.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libicui18n28.so
libicuio28.so.28 (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libicuio28.so.28
libicuio28.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libicuio28.so
libicudata28.so.28 (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libicudata28.so.28
libicudata28.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libicudata28.so
libarxmlutil.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libarxmlutil.so
libarutiljni63.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libarutiljni63.so
libarjni63.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libarjni63.so
libar.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/ar63/libar.so

They all appear to be there to me. Any possibility that the jar files
somehow require that LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set?

Thanks,
James


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux