How do, On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 13:27 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On 5/15/06, Robin Laing <Robin.Laing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Les Mikesell wrote: > > > On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 11:10, Robin Laing wrote: > > > > > >>I am like you. The only thing that would make me change quickly now > > >>would be encrypted file systems by default. Also seeing the mail list > > >>die because there were no complaints about installing FCx on this type > > >>of hardware. > > > > > > > > > With fedora, the big reason to change is that you'll stop getting > > > security updates for your installed version when the 2nd subsequent > > > version goes into beta. > > > > > > > But I thought that is what the legacy project was for. I used FC1 until > > last summer when I was between projects. I will stay with FC4 until I > > know I can get a reasonably safe install and the applications I use on a > > daily basis are in the repositories. > > > > Yes, I think you're right, that is what the legacy project is there for. Speaking of the legacy project, there's an interesting discussion going on now, on the fedora-legacy-list. Subject is, "Fedora products, to upgrade rather than backport?" > -- > To be updated... taharka Lexington, Kentucky U.S.A. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
