On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 12:24, Chris Jones wrote: > > > > Have you run any other operating systems before? Some of them > > have maintained backwards compatibility for decades. It's > > not impossible and not too much to expect for one release > > back. > > I'm not sure I understand your point. With FC5 we DO have backwards > compatibility maintained. IF you need them they are installed for you. Are > you suggesting they should be installed regardless of if anything needs them > or not. ? If so I would have to disagree, I don't want stuff on my machine I > don't need. I'm suggesting that you should never depend on a single supplier for everything or tools that make it difficult for other suppliers to cooperate. It's much too risky that you'll run into a dead end where you need a device driver or application that could easily exist for your platform but doesn't because your supplier doesn't play well with others. The compatibility you claim exists is only for things bundled for the distribution or rebuilt to match the things that change on a whim. It's not there for third party add-ons or things you've built yourself. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
