On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 12:23, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > > > Actually it's not obvious at all that a libstdc++ should > > change it's interfaces on each release. Isn't it supposed > > to implement a standard set some time ago? It's also not > > Not so long ago that compilers won't continue to evolve toward compliance > for a while. Also, the API is set by the standard, not the ABI. But > it's the ABI that matters when linking. If structures change layout or > name-mangling conventions change, you have a problem even if no changes > are needed in the your source. The lib in question is from gcc-3.3. The > current compilers for FC are gcc-4.x, so ABI changes shouldn't be > surprising. I guess that depends on your expectations. Sun claims to run binaries from Solaris 8 on Solaris 10. Are they using black magic or just doing things right? > > obvious that needed compatibility libraries would be > > omitted from a normal install. > > They aren't ommitted if you've installed something that depends on them > from an RPM that properly indicates the dependency. That requires a rather closed system, doesn't it? What if you want to run something that packager didn't provide? It just seems odd for standard libraries to not be available. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
