On Sat, 13 May 2006 09:48:11 -0600, Karl Larsen <k5di@xxxxxxxxxx> opined: > > This all has been educational but I must say that Fedora Core 4 > and 5 are not for a person who knows little about a computer. > > I wonder if a person d/l FC4 from a mirror today does it have > the lib or is it still missing it? > I'm somewhat bewildered by this post. Rather than upgrade, I did a clean install of FC5 on my laptop; Did a "yum -y update" and it ran perfectly "out of the box." The only necessary tweak was to kill Beagle which was consuming too many cycles. I honestly believe that the average Windows user who takes the time to READ THE RELEASE NOTES, can install FC5 without much difficulty. Most problems seem to occur when people mix out-of-distro software before they really know what they are doing. I love to tinker - sometimes recklessly with source builds and recompiling customized rpms. Yet, even I have been unable to seriously damage FC5. -- Our DNSRBL - Eliminate Spam: http://www.TQMcube.com Multi-RBL Check: http://www.TQMcube.com/rblcheck.php The Dirty Dozen Spammiest Ranges: http://tqmcube.com/dirty12.php
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
