On Tue May 9 2006 4:52 pm, Justin Zygmont wrote: > spamassassin is easy, I just have procmail pipe it to spamd like this: > :0fw > : > | spamc > | > :0 H > > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes > /dev/null > > > if you still get spam, just view the email headers and se what > the score was. I was suprised to find some major spam > messages coming through with a 0.0 score. Its a tough problem > to beat sometimes. Let me rephrase this, since it seems to have raised Aaron's hackles. I'm not condeming spamassassin. I'm saying I am not competent to judge spamassassin, because I haven't taken the time to learn how it works, or how to adjust the parameters by which if judges what is/isn't spam. The simple point I made in my first message was that the default configuration set up by kmail to pipe mail through spamassassin was letting more spam through then filtering through spambayes was - that's it - just a comparison of a default, unaltered, install. No judgement intended about spamassassin - if my post's wording implied otherwise, then, my words didn't convey what I was trying to say --- -- Claude Jones Brunswick, Md, USA -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
