Re: fc5: install everything?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 19:10 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On Tue, 9 May 2006, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 14:25 -0600, Tony Heaton wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 01:40 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> Its not possible or efficient for developers and designers to read all
> >>> the mails in the fedora-list to gather feedback.
> >>>
> >>> Rahul
> >>
> >> This is your regular post with regards to user input.
> >
> > Yes and it is unfortunate that the point still hasnt got through to
> > everyone
> >
> >>  We get the point
> >> that developers don't care what users think or want.  Don't just tell us
> >> to post to the devel list, they are the same developers and have the
> >> same attitude over there.
> >
> > There is no question of attitude. Use bugzilla for bug reports. If you
> > dont care enough to file a bug report, dont complain about bugs. Dont
> > expect developers to read every single mail on this high traffic list to
> > gather feedback. Use the infrastructure provided explicitly for it.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186007
> "NOTABUG" "CLOSED"
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183871
> "NOTABUG" "CLOSED"
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186802
> "DUPLICATE of 186007" "CLOSED"
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186062
> "DUPLICATE of 186007" "CLOSED"
> 
> Any other suggestions for getting the developer's attention that won't 
> result in it just getting CLOSED as NOTABUG?
> 
> It is un-useful to say 'use bugzilla' when the only response there is to 
> CLOSE it as NOTABUG.
----
That can be the only resolution in bugzilla but that shouldn't deter
anyone nor should anyone conclude that it isn't useful to open a new
bugzilla entry.

It is the one and only meaningful way to provide feedback by the users
to the developers.

My estimate was that there were about 10 people who wanted the 'install
everything' option in anaconda. According to a quick perusal of the
above links, there were less than 10.

Thus a reasonable conclusion is that those who feel that the removal of
the 'install everything' option in anaconda are statistically
insignificant.

Craig

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux