Re: Initial NFS access very slow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun May 7 2006 5:30 pm, Aaron Konstam wrote:

> > I've seen that sort of behavior in the past on a RHEL 4ES box.  Nothing
> > too beefy, but adequate enough--1gig uni-proc 2.4gig machine, IDE all the
> > way, with only a single client connected.
> >
> > The delay from the initial `ls` and the file listing can be as long as
> > ten-seconds.  It seems to only happen (for me) when mounting a
> > subdirectory of an exported file system.  In otherwords, I'll export
> > /a/sample/directory from the server, but I'll be mounting
> > /a/sample/directory/further/below on the client.
> >
> > This is fairly common scenario, of course, when automounting /home
> > directories using autofs.
> >
> > There may be some options one could change in the fstab file to fix this;
> > It happens so infrequently that I haven't bothered to research it any
> > further.
> >
> > DP
>
> Well two things come to mind. If you rely on automounting the delay
> might be expected on the first access. I think mounting a different
> directory then you are exporting should work but I owuld not be
> surprised at delays in access but I would not think that hte first time
> would be any different the second time.
>
> Are you automounting the exported directory? We have not tried nfs
> mounts to our clients in FC5 yet but we had no trouble in any of the
> other distributions except on infrequent occasions when the server had
> unexpectedly gone down and then came up. That often required a reboot
> for the nfs to re-connect.
> --
> Aaron Konstam <akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The initial delay was after the user had logged in, at which point the 
directory would have all ready been mounted.   I always chalked it up as some 
sort of networking issue.   I never saw this happen on RHEL 3 or any earlier 
versions (RHEL,RH, or Fedora), and as I said it was spurious.  

I'm not incredibly well-informed about the internals of NFS as it normally 
just works for me.

Still interested in the OP's issue and the solution, if only out of curiosity.

Thanks,
DP
--
======================================================
David-Paul Niner, RHCE
Orange Park, Florida
United States of America
dpniner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Public Key and fingerprint for GPG key 1FCE01A2
available from http://www.dpniner.name

Free/Busy Information published at:
https://horde.dpniner.name/kronolith/fb.php?u=dpniner
======================================================


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux