On Thursday, September 16, 2010 03:56:37 pm Lamar Owen wrote: > On Friday, September 10, 2010 02:28:54 pm Lamar Owen wrote: > > On Thursday, September 02, 2010 12:24:49 pm Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > you should start to see updates for F-12 soon > > > > Many thanks; seeing them. > > Ok, getting updates, but many are not working. Is exactarch=1 still normal > in /etc/yum.conf? Are glibc updates going to continue to need > exactarch=0? And are the devel packages not rebuilt yet? That is, how > close are we on the full updates rebuild? you shouldnt need exactarch=1 there is a bug in yum that we tracked down and is fixed upstream. waiting on seth to push out an update. http://yum.baseurl.org/gitweb?p=yum.git;a=commitdiff;h=a487c093c2c7c5e5c594ae866a6c740aabe367df is the commit that fixes it I have run though koji-shadow completely a couple of times now somethings were not attempted to be built due to things they were built against in primary fedora failing to build. and im slowly working though fedora 14, we do have gcc, glibc, kernel etc built. as well as python 2.7 and perl 5.12.1 still alot that needs to be built though. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ sparc mailing list sparc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sparc
