On 3/23/2010 8:01 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 06:06 +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: > >> I had an interesting problem at some point in time with this setup where >> silo and raid were not playing nicely together. > > It'll depend upon which of the 3 different superblock types you have in > use (whether it is using the boot block for its data) - please see my > kernelpodcast.org for a summary of the issues. Right, at the time I was using the type that stores the RAID metadata at the end of the disk (the old ones.. can´t remember the version number right away), and that´s also why I specifically mentioned FS corruption and not RAID corruption. >> As workaround I used to add an empty partition at the beginning of the >> disk (the smallest size as possible - basically just a padding >> partition) on both RAID-1 disks and start using the disk for real from sdX2. > > Or you can just begin a partition not at 0. I do a similar thing on my > Fedora 12 alpha Utra 5 in order to avoid any potential hiccups. Indeed that´s also another solution. Fabio _______________________________________________ sparc mailing list sparc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sparc
