Re: Maintainer for gnupg (and related) packages not responding – CVE unfixed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On St, 2016-07-20 at 15:32 +0000, Christian Stadelmann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I'm writing here since there are many known bugs (mostly fixed
> upstream), including at least one CVE in a bunch of packages critical
> to Fedora's integrity.
> 
> Libgcrypt:
> Version 1.7.2 is available: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
> id=1306064 (note that 3 updates were missed)
> CVE-2015-7511 libgcrypt: side-channel attack on ECDH with Weierstrass
> curves [fedora-all]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306
> 185

Unfortunately libgcrypt-1.7 branch adds algorithms that are potentially
patent encumbered and I did not obtain response from legal yet. So
that's the reason why I did not move to 1.7 branch yet.

As for the CVE - is actually libgcrypt used for ECDH anywhere in
Fedora? If you provide backport of the fix to 1.6 branch I'll happily
apply it.

> gnupg2:
> gnupg2 hasn't seen an update in 2 months (3 versions) to Fedora
> stable. According to this automatically created bug report https://bu
> gzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230986 the maintainer has not
> managed to ship the latest version in >1 year.

I've built gnupg-2.1.13 just recently in Rawhide and was planning to do
updates for released Fedoras but then upstream released a new version.
I plan to update Rawhide to it by this week and do updates for released
Fedoras in early August.

> This is not only bad behavior of the maintainer, it also is a bad
> sign on how security critical updates are handled in Fedora. Those
> two packages are effectively unmaintained although all of Fedora's
> security is based on them.  This is a pretty ugly situation which
> needs your attention and (probably) some action.

Really?

> The second bug report against libgcrypt has an CVE assigned and still
> it is unfixed for months. This must not happen too. There should be
> some mechanism to notify somebody if a maintainer doesn't act on CVEs
> within 3 days.

If that was not a very low impact CVE I'd be willing to spend more time
on backporting the patch however it isn't.

-- 
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
                                              Turkish proverb
(You'll never know whether the road is wrong though.)


--
security mailing list
security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Coolkey]

  Powered by Linux