Hi, On 2016-02-11 17:57, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I am trying to find out if there is anyone on this list I am, but I think not all of security-team are. Not sure about current policies which list to use for what. > On 10 February 2016 at 18:56, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> If this can't be fixed with an update, i think it's much worse than bad. >> It's not just a regression. Windows and OS X have done this correctly for >> almost a decade. There is no release criterion that applies I think. Making >> it a blocker would require adding some kind of privacy criterion? Unfortunately our last two meetings were only sparsely visisted - I did bring up the issue, but there is no outcome except that we should keep it on our agenda. I'm not accustomed enough with the release cycle for fedora, but I'd guess this would be a system-wide change, which had a deadline for 2016-02-02. [1] Maybe we should talk to the fedora-engineering people if this change would be acceptable? Also I do not know how big the required changes would be, did you already try to implement this change? ~astra [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/Schedule
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- security mailing list security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
