Hello Tomas, Tomas Hoger wrote: > Your backported patches seem to do the same thing as the upstream > commit. Look good to me and seem to fix the issue in both F-10 and > EL-4 version I quick-tested. Great, thanks for checking and testing them. >> A simple way to test this against a git server, taken from the >> initial patch in the git list thread above: >> >> $ perl -e ' >> $s="git-upload-pack git\0user=me\0host=localhost\0"; >> printf "%4.4x%s",4+length $s,$s >> ' | nc $GITHOST 9418 > > Or | git-daemon --inetd --base-path=`pwd` --export-all as suggested > in the upstream mailing list thread. Yeah. My reason for using netcat was to show how the git-daemon processes built up and consumed CPU. :) > I'm not sure any distro already worked on backports, the issue does > not seem to be fixed in any released git version yet. Correct. I don't when a 1.6.3.3 is slated. Usually git doesn't go too long between releases, but Junio said he's been busier than normal in the last "What's cooking in git.git" note to the git list. > Feel free to file in BZ, also for Bodhi update request reference. Filed as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505761 Thanks, -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I do not believe in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance. -- Thomas Carlyle
Attachment:
pgpXlVu4ybdrl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-security-list mailing list Fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-security-list
