On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 15:26:03 +0200 Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday 08 September 2008 12:23:40 Tomas Hoger wrote: > > > I also did some minor changes to your update requests. One thing > > that remains quite unclear with them is why libHX update is > > included in the same update request. > > The libHX update is included there, because the pam_mount update > needs the newer libHX library. Afaik both packages need to be in one > update to make sure they are both synced to the server at the same > time. LibHX is afaik only used by the upstream maintainer for his > various projects. Sure, that's understandable. I just prefer to have that explicit in the update notes, so I added it there. Thanks! -- Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team -- Fedora-security-list mailing list Fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-security-list
