I subscribe to this list so I can get alerted to new CVE related bugs. While the audit files change log was hard to understand at first, I can now easily scan for packages my server relies on, and run yum to get new packages if something is fixed. Is there a better way for me to learn about vulnerabilities? If this is the preferred way, then it would be nice to keep the commit log on this list, so I don't have to subscribe to both. I'd also argue that if this is the preferred way, then a new list for security discussions would be a better way to change things. -----Original Message----- From: fedora-security-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-security-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of fedora-security-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 12:00 PM To: fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Fedora-security-list Digest, Vol 19, Issue 15 Send Fedora-security-list mailing list submissions to fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-security-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fedora-security-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at fedora-security-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Fedora-security-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Separate list for commits (Kevin Fenzi) 2. [Bug 243592] CVE-2007-3112, CVE-2007-3113: cacti DoS vulnerabilities (bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx) 3. [Bug 243592] CVE-2007-3112, CVE-2007-3113: cacti DoS vulnerabilities (bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx) 4. Re: Separate list for commits (Lubomir Kundrak) 5. Re: Separate list for commits (Eugene Teo) 6. [RFC] Tracking bugs for Fedora; managing security flaws in multiple supported releases (Lubomir Kundrak) 7. fedora-security/audit fc6,1.260,1.261 fc7,1.108,1.109 (Tomas Hoger (thoger)) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:22:35 -0600 From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Separate list for commits To: fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <20070917152235.22da91ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Keywords: Debian-sarge Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:27:47 +0200 Lubomir Kundrak <lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > Wit the volume of the commit messagaes and bugzilla mails this list > became less suited for discussions. Would anyone mind creating another > list, say fedora-security-commits-list, where would that sort of mails > go? I filter such emails into another box, so discussion shows up just fine here. Perhaps we could use mailman "Topics" support better here? ie, make all bugzilla and commits emails have their own topic. If you just subscribe you get everything, but if you don't want everything you can change your topics so you don't get the things you don't want? Or for that matter, perhaps we could just get the regular commits list to have a security topic for people who only want security commits? Just a thought. > Regards, kevin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-security-list/attachments/2007091 7/e611a15e/signature.bin ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:24:43 -0400 From: bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Bug 243592] CVE-2007-3112, CVE-2007-3113: cacti DoS vulnerabilities To: fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <200709180324.l8I3OhYr027222@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: CVE-2007-3112, CVE-2007-3113: cacti DoS vulnerabilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243592 ------- Additional Comments From updates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-09-17 23:24 EST ------- cacti-0.8.6j-8.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:24:44 -0400 From: bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Bug 243592] CVE-2007-3112, CVE-2007-3113: cacti DoS vulnerabilities To: fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <200709180324.l8I3OiKS027247@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: CVE-2007-3112, CVE-2007-3113: cacti DoS vulnerabilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243592 updates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.8.6j-8.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:49:41 +0200 From: Lubomir Kundrak <lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Separate list for commits To: Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <1190119781.3341.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 15:22 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:27:47 +0200 > Lubomir Kundrak <lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Wit the volume of the commit messagaes and bugzilla mails this list > > became less suited for discussions. Would anyone mind creating another > > list, say fedora-security-commits-list, where would that sort of mails > > go? > > I filter such emails into another box, so discussion shows up just > fine here. > > Perhaps we could use mailman "Topics" support better here? > > ie, make all bugzilla and commits emails have their own topic. > If you just subscribe you get everything, but if you don't want > everything you can change your topics so you don't get the things you > don't want? > > Or for that matter, perhaps we could just get the regular commits list > to have a security topic for people who only want security commits? I would want to avoid topics. Most people don't know what they are. I find a separate list much more convenient. -- Lubomir Kundrak (Red Hat Security Response Team) ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:14:15 +0800 From: Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Separate list for commits To: Lubomir Kundrak <lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <20070918141415.GA5736@xxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii <quote sender="Lubomir Kundrak"> > Hi all, > > Wit the volume of the commit messagaes and bugzilla mails this list > became less suited for discussions. Would anyone mind creating another > list, say fedora-security-commits-list, where would that sort of mails > go? It makes a lot of sense to do it this way. Generally we want to separate these noise from the actual discussion. It also makes searching for mails in the archive easier. Eugene ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:40:22 +0200 From: Lubomir Kundrak <lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [RFC] Tracking bugs for Fedora; managing security flaws in multiple supported releases To: fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <1190126422.3341.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain Aim: To have a flexile way to deal with flaws affecting multiple packages in multiple versions of multiple products. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LubomirKundrak/TrackingBugsDraft This should grow into documentation on dealing with security flaws for both package maintainer and SRT member. -- Lubomir Kundrak (Security Response Team) Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic Registered in Brno under #CZ27690016 ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:43:25 -0400 From: "Tomas Hoger" (thoger) <fedora-extras-commits@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: fedora-security/audit fc6,1.260,1.261 fc7,1.108,1.109 To: fedora-extras-commits@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <200709181543.l8IFhPZr023894@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Author: thoger Update of /cvs/fedora/fedora-security/audit In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23869/audit Modified Files: fc6 fc7 Log Message: Vulnerable rpc code also part of nfs-utils-lib and libtirpc. Index: fc6 =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/fedora/fedora-security/audit/fc6,v retrieving revision 1.260 retrieving revision 1.261 diff -u -r1.260 -r1.261 --- fc6 17 Sep 2007 15:42:28 -0000 1.260 +++ fc6 18 Sep 2007 15:43:23 -0000 1.261 @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ CVE-2007-4168 backport (libexif) #243892 [since FEDORA-2007-614] CVE-2007-4000 backport (krb5) [since FEDORA-2007-690] CVE-2007-3999 backport (krb5) [since FEDORA-2007-690] +CVE-2007-3999 VULNERABLE (nfs-utils-lib) #294911 +CVE-2007-3999 VULNERABLE (libtirpc) #294931 CVE-2007-3962 ignore (gftp) multiple buffer overflows in fsplib, not on Linux CVE-2007-3961 ignore (gftp) off-by-one error in fsplib CVE-2007-3852 backport (sysstat) #252296 [since FEDORA-2007-675] Index: fc7 =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/fedora/fedora-security/audit/fc7,v retrieving revision 1.108 retrieving revision 1.109 diff -u -r1.108 -r1.109 --- fc7 17 Sep 2007 15:42:28 -0000 1.108 +++ fc7 18 Sep 2007 15:43:23 -0000 1.109 @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ CVE-2007-4029 backport (libvorbis) #245991 [since FEDORA-2007-1765] CVE-2007-4000 backport (krb5) [since FEDORA-2007-2017] CVE-2007-3999 backport (krb5) [since FEDORA-2007-2017] +CVE-2007-3999 VULNERABLE (nfs-utils-lib) #294901 +CVE-2007-3999 VULNERABLE (libtirpc) #294921 CVE-2007-3962 ignore (gftp) multiple buffer overflows in fsplib, not on Linux CVE-2007-3961 ignore (gftp) off-by-one error in fsplib CVE-2007-3852 backport (sysstat) #252295 [since FEDORA-2007-1697] -- fedora-extras-commits mailing list fedora-extras-commits@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-commits ------------------------------ -- Fedora-security-list mailing list Fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-security-list End of Fedora-security-list Digest, Vol 19, Issue 15 **************************************************** -- Fedora-security-list mailing list Fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-security-list
