>>>>>> "DG" == Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > DG> We have under a month to get FE3 up to scratch or support will be > DG> turned off. > > Something sounds wrong with this. I mean, FE3 has all sorts of > problems including unfixable broken dependencies and somehow it's up > to us to meet some deadline for fixing problems there? > > Not that there's anything wrong with fixing security issues in FE3, > but I don't understand why the onus is put entirely on us. Some of the broken dependencies can be fixed. The Onus is not entirely on us. But the Onus is on those who want to to either Fix the issues or get the maintainers to be active for there packages. Dennis
