On 20/07/2020 18:53, Luc Ducazu wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Thanks for reaching out. > > Scilab is not the only component that prevents the build from completing succesfully... > In the short term, we could just exclude theses packages, so there is a Scientific Spin for F33. > > In the long run, we should do a thourough revision of the package list. There is too much stress on development tools and too little on actual scientific packages to my taste. > > Let me know what you think, > -- Luc > _______________________________________________ > scitech mailing list -- scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to scitech-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Hi, thanks for your answer. My mails main intention is to bring the spin back in F33, so my first suggestion would be exclusing these packages, too. About the revision of the package list: +1, that was also one reason for the seperate Astronomy spin (beneath the size of some of its packages… shiny virtual planet maps are huge…) Greetings Christian _______________________________________________ scitech mailing list -- scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to scitech-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
